The planned setback in US climate protection
A step backwards with a signal effect - USA plans to abolish endangerment finding
The United States is facing a far-reaching cut in its climate policy. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is currently preparing to withdraw one of the country's most important climate policy foundations: the so-called "Endangerment Finding". This 2009 regulation determined that greenhouse gases endanger human health and welfare. It formed the legal basis for numerous emission limits and climate protection measures over the past 15 years.
The planned abolition of this classification could have far-reaching consequences. Without it, the Environmental Protection Agency would no longer have the legal authority to set national limits for CO₂ or other greenhouse gases - neither for the transport sector nor for industrial facilities or power plants. This threatens not only an end to existing regulations, but also a permanent weakening of US climate policy at federal level.
The transportation sector, which is currently responsible for around a quarter of total greenhouse gas emissions in the USA, would be particularly affected. Passenger cars and light commercial vehicles account for the majority of these. In the past, binding CO₂ limits have led to more efficient engines, lower fuel consumption and reduced emissions. This development could now be brought to an abrupt halt.
Figures & impact of the planned withdrawal of climate protection regulations in the USA
54 billion USD/year savings
This figure comes from estimates by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA ) on the planned repeal of emissions regulations.
It refers to the supposedly eliminated regulatory costs, especially for vehicle manufacturers, energy suppliers and industry.
The estimate was published by the EPA itself as part of the current proposal to withdraw the "Endangerment Finding".
>2 trillion USD social benefit
This figure is an aggregate estimate from previous cost-benefit analyses of emission standards - also supported by EPA and independent studies, among others.
It is made up of:
Fuel savings (~820 billion USD)
Climate damage, health costs, etc. (~1.2 to 1.8 trillion USD)
The value relates to the period from approx. 2025-2055 if current regulations are continued
The planned repeal of climate regulations is highly controversial both economically and politically. While supporters point to savings for companies, critics warn of the loss of billions in climate and health benefits. The draft is still in the consultation process, but legal disputes are foreseeable. Uncertainty is also growing in the economy - for example with regard to investments in climate-friendly technologies. The decision could set the tone for future US climate policy.